NUS–UGA Telecollaboration Project 2026

Primary Guide — Marking Form  ·  3 Criteria  ·  100 marks total

Criterion 1: Group Collaboration (20%) Criterion 2: Dialogic Quality (25%) Criterion 3: Individual Portfolio & Presentation (55%)

Quick Reference — Where to look in the Student Evidence Form

Section B Meeting Log → C1.1 Documentation
Section C Participation Balance → C1.2 Balance
Section D Traceability & Revision → C1.3 + C2.1
Section E Cultural Adaptation → C2.1 – C2.3
Section F Visible Negotiation → C2.4
Section G Individual Reflection → C3.1 – C3.4 (+ oral)

Group Information

Fill in before assessing

▼
Select a group above — student evidence will load automatically
Group criteria — written primary guide (45%)

Criterion 1 — Group Collaboration & Engagement

Process, method and rigour · Documentation (§B), Balance (§C), Traceability (§D)

Group · 20%▼
Criterion 1 total— / 20

Criterion 2 — Dialogic Quality: Content, Form & Adaptation

Responsiveness (§D–E), Adaptation (§E), Nuance (§E), Visible Negotiation (§F)

Group · 25%▼
Criterion 2 total— / 25
Individual criterion — written reflection & oral presentation (55%)

Criterion 3 — Individual Written Reflection & Oral Presentation

Based on Section G of the Student Evidence Form & oral defence · Clarity · Dialogic Justification · Intercultural Insight · Critical Reflection

Individual · 55%▼

Score Summary

Criterion 1 — Collaboration (group)

—

out of 20

Criterion 2 — Dialogic Quality (group)

—

out of 25

⬤ Draft auto-saved locally